What is car accident settlement based on?
A settlement is based on a number of factors. This includes types of injuries and treatment and time lost from work. The amount of recovery time ...
|
|
A settlement is based on a number of factors. This includes types of injuries and treatment and time lost from work. The amount of recovery time ...
Copyright (c) 2010 Benjamin Glass
A personal injury claim is filed when you are the victim of injury because of the negligence of another party. In most cases, a personal injury claim is first filed with an insurance company that carries auto, homeowners, business, malpractice or Workers’ Compensation insurance, depending on the nature of your accident.
Once you file a personal injury claim, you will need to follow through with evidence of your accident, injuries and financial damages. An insurance company may offer you an early settlement to get you to resolve the claim quickly and for a low amount. In some cases, you may be denied a settlement completely.
...|
Chicago Attorneys of Friend, Levinson & Turner, LTD Launch New Website As Chicago car accident attorneys, they protect clients from insurance tactics, obtain the compensation that clients are entitled and advise them before accepting a settlement, taking the pressures off the client and their family while recovering from |
|
Claims for Road Traffic Accidents - Is compensation being paid any quicker? With more and more cars being driven in the UK and with our roads becoming increasingly congested, the risk of becoming injured in a car accident has also increased. In order to deal with the volume of personal injury claims arising from these |
Belly Dancing Scuttles Woman's Disability Claim
A New York City woman recently lost some of her divorce settlement money. She had claimed a car accident left her too injured to work. Then she blogged about belly-dancing performances. When her ex-husband found out about her hip-shaking hobby,
|
|
Attorney-at-law Opens Firm in Dallas Fort Worth Area The new Law Office of Michael D. Uvalle, which works on all types of personal injury and car accident cases, will focus its attention on car accident victims and persons having issues with their insurance claims. “What we are aiming to do is to provide |
|
How to Claim For Automobile Diminished Value The Right Way However, your car now has a claim registered against it and through no fault of your own, public perception makes it worth less, a lot less, on the open market compared to a claim free vehicle. This is called Diminished Value. |





For example:
Jill was involved in an automobile accident with Jack, an employee of ABC, Inc. ABC’s insurance company offered Jill $10,000 to cover damages to her and the car, and to settle her claim against ABC. Jill did not accept the offer at the time, but instead filed suite against ABC and its insurance company. Later Jill offered to settle the case for $40,000, but the defendants refused her offer. Ultimately, Jill told the defendants
Ford Motor Co. does not owe damages to a Leawood man severely burned in a 2003 traffic crash, a Jackson County jury decided Monday.</p><p>The verdict came after a monthlong trial that stemmed from a crash that killed a Missouri Highway Patrol trooper and seriously injured Michael Nolte.</p><p>The trooper, Michael Newton, and Nolte were sitting in the trooper’s Crown Victoria patrol car along Interstate 70 when it was struck from behind by a truck on May 22, 2003. After the patrol car burst into flames, witnesses pulled Nolte from the wreckage.</p><p>A 2005 trial also resulted in a verdict in favor of Ford, but the Missouri Supreme Court ordered a new trial on appeal. The trooper’s family reached a confidential settlement with Ford before this trial.</p><p>Attorneys for Nolte, 57, and his wife asked this jury for more than $46 million in compensatory damages. </p><p>Jurors deliberated for about eight hours on Friday and Monday before returning the verdict. They left the courthouse without commenting to the media.</p><p>“While we are disappointed in the outcome, we still appreciate the hard work of the jury,” Grant Davis, one of the lawyers who represented the Noltes, said Monday.</p><p>Newton had pulled Nolte over to give him a warning about driving too long in the passing lane. They were sitting in the trooper’s car when a truck towing a trailer at 65 mph ran into the car. The truck driver later said he was reaching for some sunglasses when he crashed.</p><p>The collision tore the car’s fuel filler tube, and the car burst into flames. Nolte suffered severe burns, spent 65 days in a hospital burn unit and has undergone skin grafts and surgeries. He will suffer pain for the rest of his life, suffers from post-traumatic stress, has difficulty sleeping because of the pain and has considered suicide, Davis told the jury.</p><p>“While Ford’s sympathies go out to the Nolte family, we agree with the jury that Ford should not be blamed for Mr. Nolte’s injuries,” said Jim Feeney, an attorney who represented Ford. “The true cause of this accident was the distracted driver of the 13,000-pound vehicle that ran into the parked police interceptor at 65 mph.”</p><p>The jury in the first trial in 2005 came to the same conclusion.</p><p>That jury found in favor of Ford but awarded $8.5 million in damages to be paid by the truck driver’s employer. A pre-trial agreement had capped the company’s liability at $1 million covered by its insurance.</p><p>Davis declined to comment on whether Monday’s verdict would be appealed.</p><p>“Even though Ford prevailed, we hope Ford takes the opportunity to improve its product,” he said.</p><p>During closing arguments on Friday, Davis told jurors that the Crown Victoria was defectively manufactured and that Ford was well aware of its propensity to catch fire in rear-end crashes. Davis argued that Ford put “profit over safety” by continuing to produce the vehicles without addressing what he said was the “root cause” of the fire — the placement of the car’s gas tank behind the rear axle.</p><p>However, Feeney argued that no vehicle on the road could withstand being rear-ended by a truck and trailer weighing in excess of 13,000 pounds and traveling at that speed.</p><p>“The Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor was designed to the highest rear-impact standards of any vehicle in the world,” he said after Monday’s verdict. “Ford has done all that is reasonable to reduce the risk of fire in its products, but no gas-powered vehicle is fireproof in such extreme collisions.”
Recent comments